Republicans Running Scared From Minneapolis

Talk about a sign of the times. Whether it be the toxicity of Bush, the toxicity of the Republican brand or the acknowledgment that Republican incumbents in 2008 had better stay home and earn votes rather than attend the Republican convention, this really can't be good:

Nine of 12 targeted Republicans running in the most competitive Senate races this fall are either skipping the Republican convention in St. Paul, Minn., or have not decided whether to attend.

Among those who will not attend are Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska, who is not close to presumptive presidential nominee Sen. John McCain of Arizona, and Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, who is a McCain loyalist. Stevens and Collins will use the convention week to focus on their campaigns.

Also sending regrets is former Rep. Bob Schaffer of Colorado, running for the seat being vacated by retiring GOP Sen. Wayne Allard.

Six others -- Sens. Roger Wicker of Mississippi, John Sununu of New Hampshire, Elizabeth Dole of North Carolina and Gordon Smith of Oregon and challengers John Kennedy of Louisiana and Rep. Steve Pearce of New Mexico are still on the fence. Their spokesman offered responses ranging from "there are no plans yet" to "no decisions have been made."

Scratch that. Senator Dole is no longer on the fence.

U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Dole of North Carolina won't be attending the Republican national convention, which begins over Labor Day weekend.

Her spokeswoman, Katie Hallaway, said people shouldn't read too much into the decision -- either about the senator's support for John McCain, her party's likely nominee, or about how she views the security of her re-election in November against Democratic state senator Kay Hagan.

Oh, no, of course not. We wouldn't do such a thing. What's Dole's reasoning?

"She's got a busy week scheduled in North Carolina," Hallaway said. "When there are breaks in the Senate schedule, she spends as much time as possible in North Carolina."

Hmm, interesting, she found time for a prime time spot at the 2004 convention.

And here's Susan Collins' excuse:

"She is going to spend the time in Maine campaigning," said Steve Abbott, her campaign manager. "The conventions are too close to the election for a federal candidate to give up the time to attend, especially a current office holder who has to be in Washington for a busy legislative session for much of September."

Abbott would also like to remind us that Collins did not attend the '96 convention either. Of course, she wasn't in the Senate yet and she did attend the two subsequent conventions during her time in the senate, not to mention she's one of John McCain's campaign co-chairs. But other than that, really, it's no biggie that she won't be in Minneapolis to celebrate John McCain's acceptance of the 2008 nomination.

So, of the top targeted senate races, which GOP incumbents will be attending the festivities? Looks like McCain will be surrounded by Mitch McConnell and Norm Coleman, who lobbied to get Minneapolis to host the event. Wanna bet Norm is having second thoughts about that decision right about now?



Display:


Re: Republicans Running Scared From Minneapolis (none / 0)

Hysterical.

The bigger question is: Will McCain get a nice post-convention poll dive?


Obama/Sebelius '08
by evantakesall on Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 07:54:13 AM EST

Re: Republicans Running Scared From Minneapolis (none / 0)

The perfect play now for the Dems in question is to announce loudly and proudly just how horribly afraid their Republican opponents are of looking like Republicans.  They are afraid to be anywhere near the Bush-McCain action.

Something along the lines of "Sen. so-and-so is afraid to be seen embracing the Bush-McCain failures of the past eight years.  Unfortunately, we have far too many examples of their adherence to Bush rather than the American people."  List of unpopular Republican legislation follows.


by odinseye2k on Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 08:11:55 AM EST

I'm pretty sure there are some House (none / 0)

Dems who aren't coming to ours.


"No government has the right to tell its citizens whom to love. The only queer people are those who don't love anybody." - Rita Mae Brown
by auboy2006 on Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 09:53:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'm pretty sure there are some House (none / 0)

From where?
If HRC were the nominee, I could defintily see a lot of Southern Democrats avoiding the convention.

Have you actually read about any House Member stating that they won't go to Denver?


by gavoter on Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 11:44:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Deja Vu in reverse (none / 0)

I seem to recall a similar situation from 2004. Carson, Tennenbaum, Knowles et al didn't go to the Democratic convention for fear of being linked to the national party. They all lost anyway.


by conspiracy on Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 08:21:31 AM EST

We're not looking forward to it, either (none / 0)

The only people happy that the Republicans are holding their convention here are hotel owners and the sex industry.  Hotel staff and anyone who doesn't want our roads clogged with rich conservatives with entitlement complexes in rented Hummers (ahem, so to speak) will be mightily frustrated.

Over 35,000 showed up for Obama's speech two months back, but that was an event for the common people of the Twin Cities.  The RNC is going to be an event by and for the out-of-towners who messed up our country.  

So yes, I hope Coleman regrets it.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 09:19:12 AM EST

Re: Republicans Running Scared From Minneapolis (none / 0)

I hate to quibble about something that does not pertain to the substance of this piece, but St. Paul and Minneapolis are 'twin cities.'  That means they are not institutionally or culturally interchangeable even though they are linked and proximate.  I grew up in MPLS and never visited St. Paul more than a few times a year.  St. Paul residents, in particular, are protective of their smaller city's independent status.  I'm glad the Republicans are running scared, but they are scared of St. Paul, not its neighbor.


The future is unwritten
by Strummerson on Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 09:45:40 AM EST

To be fair... (none / 0)

Minneapolis probably has more hotels; the cities are going to be considered interchangable by this event.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 09:50:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: To be fair... (none / 0)

Nope.  Many hotels in St. Paul surrounding the convention center.  Remember that St. Paul is the state capital.  Plenty of accommodations there.  I think you are right that some will consider them interchangeable.  Doesn't mean that it's appropriate.  And if so, best to refer to the convention taking place in the 'Twin Cities'.

But again, I don't think this is all that important.  Maybe Republicans in St. Paul will be pissed off at a slight and it will drive them to vote for Franken over their former mayor.  If so, let's encourage Republicans to talk about their Minneapolis convention...


The future is unwritten
by Strummerson on Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 11:34:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I'm admittedly biased (none / 0)

I'm an unabashed Minneapolis resident who gets confused transversing St. Paul streets.  I'm comfortable with a little snubbing of the state capitol. :P


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 11:41:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'm admittedly biased (none / 0)

Aha!  You reinforce my point.  It took me living elsewhere for a decade to concede St. Paul's charms.


The future is unwritten
by Strummerson on Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 11:44:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

They need more bike paths (none / 0)

I'd be happier with St. Paul if they continued the Midtown Greenway bike path from Minneapolis.  Admittedly this is a small problem...  


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 11:53:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

To be fair (none / 0)

it IS a big event when Sugar Lips comes to North Carolina.  I can see why she wouldn't want to reschedule such a once in a generation event.


by DrFrankLives on Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 09:56:35 AM EST

Re: Republicans Running Scared From Minneapolis (none / 0)

The convention is in St. Paul, not Minneapolis.  Interesting they'd hold it in the city that set up the career of former democrat and current Bush lapdog, Senator Coleman.  Do they think Bush's appearance in his old digs will give him an electoral boost?  Let's hope not.


by surakmn on Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 11:42:42 AM EST

Uh, unlikely (none / 0)

Even Republicans in Minnesota don't really like Bush much.  Minnesotans aren't too big on association issues anyway: People speak for themselves.  Coleman giving a home run speech at the RNC would help him.  Not much else.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 11:57:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

So we're sure (none / 0)

that unlike half the GOP Senate, McCain has to actually go to St. Paul to accept the nomination, right?  Bummer for him.


by jroyale on Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 01:43:54 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.